On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:29:03 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> I think the current distinction of DS> DS> netsnmp_get vs netsnmp_iquery_get DS> DS> is much less confusing.
Hmm... I can't find a netsnmp_get anywhere... DS> I presume you're suggesting DS> DS> netsnmp_iquery_session_pdu DS> netsnmp_iquery_session_user DS> netsnmp_iquery_session_community DS> DS> rather than the current routines? I'm confused, because all I can find are netsnmp_query_*, where * is a command/pdu equivalent. Those names seem fine to me. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you shotput a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track? If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy. Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
