On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:47:35 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> > DS> > Now, what about older releases? DS> > DS> 5.1.x - Ummm.... not sure. DS> > DS> I'm happy to leave that decision to the 5.1.x line manager :-) DS> > DS> > Well, not honoring the enabled flag (5.1.2 status) definitely seems like DS> > a bug, and honoring it causes the issues described in my initial mail. So DS> > I see it as a hidden bug, revealed by another fix. DS> DS> OK. DS> If you can convince the manager of the 5.1.x line, that's fine by me.
Hmm.. I guess that would be Wes, who hasn't spoken up. He'd better speak up soon, or the 5.1.3 release engineer will make an executive decision. Anyone else care to weigh in on the issue? (particularly core developers) -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
