On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 09:49 +0100, Dave Shield wrote: > On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 17:47, Robert Story wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:27:13 +0100 Dave wrote: > > > DS> <asm/types.h> is needed for RH9, and should be safe enough under Fedora. > > DS> But it doesn't feel quite right, somehow.... > > > > On YellowDog (Fedora-ish ppc clone), that gets me __u8, but not u8. > > Same on Fedora. > On RH9, it has both __u8 *and* u8. > (though only if __KERNEL__ is defined) > > I'm wondering whether it might not be safer to define these > typedefs ourselves... > > Dave
I was searching for an easier solution for this and I've ended with defining those types in the patch. Also the above solution is arch specific, x86_64 doesn't have them. Radek -- Radek Vokál <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
