>>>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:53:58 -0700 (PDT), "David T. Perkins" <[EMAIL 
>>>>> PROTECTED]> said:

David> Please, re-engineer snmptrapd to not be a subagent at
David> all!!!!!!!!!

There are many reasons for having it be a subagent.  the NLM mib is
just one.  Your issue is not whether or not its a subagent, but rather
that it implements the NLM mib, right?

Now, having said that, the NLM mib actually works ok there.  There are
some odd aspects to it, but it does work.  You should know, however,
when you're looking at the architecture that it doesn't register under
a default context.  It registers under the "snmptrapd" SNMPv3 context
and thus there shouldn't be any confusion that the MIB isn't the one
possibly provide by the agent (which, actually, we don't do).

-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to