Wes Hardaker wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:28:14 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Weighing in late:
I'd vote for -testing with an auto-subscribe of everyone on admin. If
they want to remove themselves, thats fine.
I don't think forcing people on testing permanently is necessarily
right unless they're either the release manager or working in that
tree. If you want to get really picky and write lots of code, mail
anyone who has posted code to that branch in the last 7 days or
something. Heh. But that would be more pain to implement than is
worth it.
Not too uncommon, in fact, and no need to write lots of additional code
either. "buildbot" supports this out of the box: see the "blamelist"
feature on
http://buildbot.sourceforge.net/PyCon-2003/buildbot.html#auto2
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
