Quoting myself:
Thanks. I've updated the patch according to your comments:
http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1226187
This may go into 5.3.dev. Can you immediately spot any changes that do
*not* apply to 5.[12]?
I've applied the patch to all of 5.[123].x. 5.1.x doesn't support
"-3[kKmM]", so I left this single change (in snmpcmd.1.def) out, of course.
While applying the patch I noticed that both 5.2.x and 5.1.x
documentation doesn't really mention AES as a privProtocol, although
5.2.x supports AES|AES128 and 5.1.x supports AES128|AES192|AES256.
Shouldn't we align 5.1.x to also accept "AES" (=AES128) and fully
document "AES" (at various places) for 5.[12].x?
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
