All, Feature request time!
Can we have snmptrapd outputting all traps to a FIFO, which another process can then read from and process the traps? I have a trap sent every time one of my switches learns or expires a MAC address from its forwarding table, which equals a few thousand traps an hour. If I could attach a perl process to a FIFO, I'd save having to spawn 3000+ processes per hour, plus the resultant CPU. I wouldn't even mind if it's one FIFO for all traps. Is this possible/sensible? Peter. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
