On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:21:46 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EYC> > This code is perfectly fine, and worked in the code I generated using EYC> > 5.2.1 CVS. Something else must be going on with memory access... EYC> EYC> Did you use ehterStatsTable to generate template? EYC> The strange thing is if I not set etherStatsDataSource_len, the subagent EYC> works just fine. Only when I set etherStatsDataSource_len to none-zero it EYC> causes segmentation fault.
Not to non-zero, but something greater than 10. I don't know how I haven't run across this in my testing, but I did track it down. The length in the get function is supposed to be in bytes, and the memcpy does take that into account. However, the size check at the top of the function does not, thus the memcpy is overwriting the buffer. This will only happen for objects that exceed the default buffer size (40 bytes). Here is a patch that should fix this. Let me know if you still have problems... http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1244838&group_id=12694&atid=456380 -- NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted unless they are requests for paid consulting services. Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
