Robert Story wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:38:17 +0200 Thomas wrote:
TA> BTW, has the test #19 failure (for 5.[23]) ever been looked at in the
TA> meantime?
That's the snmpusm one, right? I've been hoping Wes would tackle that one.
Yes, it's snmpusm. Given Wes' vacation plans, this'll likely keep us at
48/49 (and prevent 5.2.2) for the near future. :-(
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
