Robert Story wrote: > TA> > I'm a little concerned that Thomas seems to think this is already fixed, > TA> > but Dave has checked in a fix. I tend to avoid the v3 stuff when I can, > TA> > so I just want to see if some double checking is called for? > TA> > TA> I'm referring to Wes' fixes discussed in this thread:
> So, maybe he is referring to Wes' fixes, and not the uptime in seconds > function that was being batted about. Dave, is that right? Yes - that's correct. The problem that Yegor reported was probably fixed (by Wes) roughly ten months ago. The comments against that patch don't quite match this particular problem description (which is why I've asked Yegor to check whether the current code works properly or not), but I'm very confident that it should be OK. It's slightly unfortunate that Yegor has been working with the old 5.0.x line (where this fix wasn't applied), and even more unfortunate that I didn't investigate the current code more fully before responding. Sorry for the confusion. Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
