On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 01:23:40 +0200 Thomas wrote: TA> is there a good reason to *not* set NETSNMP_DS_AGENT_NO_ROOT_ACCESS TA> (i.e. imply the "-r" option) if the agent is run as a *non-root* user TA> (through either "-u" option, "agentUser" token or setting TA> NETSNMP_DS_AGENT_USERID)?
Not that I can think of. TA> What's even more odd is that if TA> he uses the "agentUser" token, there's not even a corresponding config TA> token to specify NETSNMP_DS_AGENT_NO_ROOT_ACCESS. There are probably lots of disconnects between the two. Sometimes it just doesn't make sense, and this might be one of those cases. Check the code flow, and it may be that by the time a 'noRoot' config token was parsed, it's too late. -- NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted unless they are requests for paid consulting services. Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders