Thanks, Robert.

Maybe we will:
In the Proxy's snmpd.conf, add lines like 
#proxy  -Cn  agent-A.sysUpTime.0  -v  2c  -c  public  agent-A-ip   sysUpTime.0
#proxy  -Cn  agent-B.sysUpTime.0  -v  2c  -c  public  agent-B-ip   sysUpTime.0
. . .
#proxy  -Cn  agent-N.sysUpTime.0  -v  2c  -c  public  agent-N-ip   sysUpTime.0

and let the Client make requests:
#snmpwalk  -v  2c  -c  public Proxy-ip  agent-A.sysUpTime.0 
#snmpwalk  -v  2c  -c  public Proxy-ip  agent-N.sysUpTime.0 

The only thing that we need to do is test it.

------------------------------------
A new question presents
------------------------------------

We hope that the Proxy can store all of the Agents'  SNMP replies data/date to 
our Oracle DB.
We will install a web server and our web-based Report System on the Proxy (for 
security, to install 
web server and the Report System on an independent RH server is considerable). 
So the Clients user can read the historical/statistical SNMP reports (our 
private data) on their IE.

The question is how to store the SNMP data to Oracle on the Proxy? We should 
add lines to original NET-SNMP code on the Proxy, right?
Maybe we will re-write our Agents' sub-agent. 
The data will be pushed into Oracle directly from sub-agent, instead of from 
the Proxy.
From the Proxy or the Agents, which is preferred?

Please give me your suggestions.
Thanks everyone!!

Regards,
Rex Huang


-----原始邮件-----
发件人: Robert Story [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
发送时间: 2005年8月30日 23:46
收件人: Rex Huang
抄送: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
主题: Re: Multi-Proxy likely Solution


On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:22:50 +0800 Rex wrote:
RH> It seems net-snmp cannot proxy to multi-SNMP-hosts (we say all of the
RH> Agents).

Sure it can. Why do you think it can't?

-- 
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
      unless they are requests for paid consulting services.

Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>

You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. 

Reply via email to