On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 13:35 +0200, Thomas Anders wrote: > Dave Shield wrote: > > My inclination would be to have a separate make target. > > So > > make test > > would check whether the suite was behaving properly, > > and > > make test-mibII > > would report what objects the agent implemented. > > Agreed in principle, but I find "test-mibII" harder to type/remember > than necessary.
I'd agree. That was more intended as an illustration of the proposed mechanism, rather than necessarily the "correct" target name. I ought to be more careful - placeholders have a habit of being shipped! > Proposals from the top of my head: > > test-mibsupport How about (aiming a little lower!): make test-mibs Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
