>>>>> On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 14:30:12 -0400, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Robert> Are you sure? I know you were fairly attached to the idea of Robert> the user gleaning information from the library name, so I Robert> fully expected you to vote for the -release-info option (eg Robert> libnetsnmp-5.2.so.0). No. I absolutely hate that option. Do you know how many configure scripts I've written where I've had to figure out the proper library name of the libdb from the berkeley db library? It's a real pain in the neck to have software compile against ours if our library names aren't consistent from release to release. I'd be really really really opposed to having to specify anything but -lnetsnmp on the command line for apps that use our libraries. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
