HI, And I hope that part of "doing the right thing" is to replace the implementation of RFC 3014 (the log MIB) with another logging mechanism.
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Wes Hardaker wrote: > >>>>> On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 15:22:38 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>> said: > > Dave> The underlying idea of restricting access to different categories > Dave> of action (separately configurable) is probably sensible enough. > Dave> But trying to shoehorn this into the existing VACM table is Just > Dave> Plain Wrong. > > Dave> If we're going to do this, then let's Do It Right. > > There's actually no reason why we can't use this as a temp solution > and then later do the right thing either. > > I do agree, it's not the ideal solution. But the ideal one will take > a significantly greater amount of time to design and implement. And I > don't think we can get it done before 5.3 (mainly due to ensuing > arguments I'm sure will happen), and I don't think we should let 5.3 > go out without something in place. > > -- > Wes Hardaker > Sparta, Inc. > Regards, /david t. perkins ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
