On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 10:23 -0400, Robert Story wrote: > DS> So you're probably right: for > DS> 5.3, just enable it on known good architectures. > > Do we know what those are?
Ummm: $ cd agent/mibgroup/host $ $ grep ifdef *.c | grep -v '[A-Z]' | sort -k 2 | uniq hr_swrun.c:#ifdef cygwin hr_storage.c:#ifdef dynix hr_swrun.c:#ifdef dynix hr_swinst.c:#ifdef freebsd2 hr_network.c:#ifdef hpux11 hr_disk.c:#ifdef linux hr_filesys.c:#ifdef linux hr_proc.c:#ifdef linux hr_storage.c:#ifdef linux hr_swrun.c:#ifdef linux hr_system.c:#ifdef linux hr_storage.c:#ifdef __osf__ hr_filesys.c:#ifdef solaris2 hr_other.c:#ifdef solaris2 hr_proc.c:#ifdef solaris2 hr_storage.c:#ifdef solaris2 hr_swrun.c:#ifdef solaris2 So Linux and Solaris should be safe enough. HP/UX, FreeBSD and Dynix might be OK. I'm a little surprised to see cygwin in that list. Maybe the windows experts would like to comment on the status of the Host Resources support on such systems? > DS> Given that most people probably don't manipulate [DisMan tables] directly, > DS> then I doubt this would be particularly significant. > > So it's ok to enable it by default? Oh go on - seeing as it's you. When have I ever been able to deny you anything? Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
