On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:49:16 +0200 Thomas wrote:
TA> OK, so 8 is just reserved for 5.1.x "just in case"? I'd be fine with
TA> that, as opposed to change 5.1.x immediately (which also Dave and Jochen
TA> voted against). Did we reach consensus here? =:o
Well, the issue is whether or not there is an incompatability between 5.0.x and
5.1.x. There almost certainly is, so an installation of 5.0.x that upgraded to
5.1.x would almost ceratinly have the same issues. So I'm on the fence here...
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
