On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 00:45 +0200, Thomas Anders wrote: > Dave Shield wrote on 2004-08-23(!): > > Dave> But one of the major tasks is to go through the existing debug > > statements > > Dave> and come up with a suitable hierarchical debug token structure. > > Dave> (Plus identifying where we really ought to have debugging statements, > > Dave> but don't!) Volunteers gratefully received :-) > > > > Bruce> I could have a look [at this] > > Bruce> What I need are the parameters for "ought". > > > > "If I were developing an application [client/agent/MIB module] > > using this part of the Net-SNMP library, and it wasn't working, > > what information would I need to track down the problem". > > Unfortunately this effort doesn't seem to have been finished.
I'm not sure whether it was ever even started :-( > Will we be able to clean that up (a bit) before 5.3? If someone volunteers to do so. If not, not. Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
