On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:44:44 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> >> - default the mfd-rewrites to enabled
WH>
WH> Bruce> What is the impact of this?
WH>
WH> I'm not sure which architecture's it's supported on. I suspect that
WH> it might be wise to if-def it in on some of the more supported ones
WH> (linux) rather than the ones we likely suspect it won't work on
WH> (Ultrix). Thoughts?
As I said earlier, the new mfd code already does ifdefs in it's headers, so
nothing should be affected on unsupported systems.
Of course, it'd be nice if someone would port some of the rewrites to another
OS (it's really just extracting code from exiting implementations and
moving/reorganizing to the new method) just to see if we like (or can at
least live with) the general layout I made up.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
