RS> the answer is no.
English is not my native language, be patient with me.
Do you have any other suggestion that I can try before attempting to modify the sources?
Regards,
Rafael
On 9/15/05, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:38:56 -0300 Rafael wrote:
RG> I took a look at the snmp code and I found out that in the function static
RG> void _init_snmp(void) there is a static variable called have_done_init
RG> that prevents snmp from doing more than one initialization. The same
RG> happens in the function void init_snmp(const char *type). I think that in
RG> my case, it is necessary to make a complete initialization each time a
RG> switch over is done. Is it a way to do this without modifying the sources?
If you meant 'is there a way to do this without modifying the sources', then
the answer is no.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: < http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
