>>>>> On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:55:09 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> I wondered about that, but decided against it. Dave> Leaving this code in 'table_data2.c' helps show that Dave> this is a reworking of the previous 'table_data' helper. Dave> The connection between 'table_data' and 'table_data2' Dave> is clearer than between 'table_data' and 'tdata' IMO. I really think that if it's a new concept then it should have a new name, not one with a 2 at the end... the 2-at-the-end hack was mine to fix broken code that the new code failed to take into account. Now that it's been properly defined under a new name I think the file names should match. Dave> And given that I've hijacked (sorry "reworked") the Dave> mib2c.table_data.conf template to use the new tdata helper Dave> instead - it felt important to emphasise that connection. Dave> So I'd prefer to leave things as they stand. We should rename that too then. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
