On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:24:50AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote: > On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 07:41 +0200, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 07:14:33PM -0400, sasson, shuki wrote: > > > I actually done some digging into 5.2.1 code and I saw that everything is > > > going through udp and not udp6 as it should be. I wander when and if this > > > problem was fixed in later official versions and if not when will it be > > > fixed. > > > > CVS revision 5.23 of agent/agent_trap.c as per 30-Aug-05, it will appear in > > the 5.3 release. > > Given that this problem seems to appear in the 5.2.x line, > should the same fix be applied there too? What about 5.1.x ?
As it is somewhat problematic (the issue of the lost additional port specifier) I think that it shouldn't be pushed to far, but 5.2 sounds safe. I have to admit that I am uncertain how far back patches should be ported, is there any policy on that documented? What I really would like is Robert's take on it since it is his patch. /MF ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
