On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:39:45 -0700 Fong
wrote:
FT> I used Net::SNMP get_table to query data. Is it possible that my client
FT> passes garbage packets to server causes this problem?
FT>
FT> -----Original Message-----
FT> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FT> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Robert
FT> Story
FT> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 3:15 PM
FT> To: Vijay Krishna
FT> Cc: [email protected]; Subramanian, Binu
FT> Subject: Re: subagent exceeding packet request to master agentx.
FT>
FT> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 05:18:35 -0500 Vijay wrote:
FT> VK> I get the message at the master agentx side as below
FT> VK>
FT> VK> ->Maximum packet size exceeded in a request.
FT> VK>
FT> VK> Is it an error or is it ignored by the master ?
FT> I used Net::SNMP get_table to query data. Is it possible that my client
FT> passes garbage packets to server causes this problem?
FT>
FT> -----Original Message-----
FT> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FT> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Robert
FT> Story
FT> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 3:15 PM
FT> To: Vijay Krishna
FT> Cc: [email protected]; Subramanian, Binu
FT> Subject: Re: subagent exceeding packet request to master agentx.
FT>
FT> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 05:18:35 -0500 Vijay wrote:
FT> VK> I get the message at the master agentx side as below
FT> VK>
FT> VK> ->Maximum packet size exceeded in a request.
FT> VK>
FT> VK> Is it an error or is it ignored by the master ?
Sat 10/1/2005 11:32 AM, Robert Story
wrote:
RS> Are both the agent and sub-agent based on net-snmp? Have
you turned on debugging and gotten packet dumps?
Yes, both agent and sub-agent are based on net-snmp 5.0.9. Couldn't run
debug on customer site.
Thanks,
FT
