On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 07:02:20 -0700 Wes wrote: WH> Dave> But surely what we're interested in providing (by default) is the WH> Dave> Event-MIB *functionality*, rather than a particular implementation? WH> WH> I think Robert's point should be if we're turning it on by default it WH> should be somewhat well tested code.
Exactly. WH> However, this is also a case WH> where the code does nothing until configured so I doubt it's a big WH> deal as far as a default config of not-on goes. Good point. WH> But I'm only barely on that side of the fence. Ok, so now I'm on the fence, and leaning in y'alls direction. ;-) -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
