On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 10:33:11 +0200 Thomas wrote: TA> > counter64 support to snmp_add_var (so they can be sent w/snmptrap) TA> TA> Can this be applied to the patches branches (5.[12].x) as well? Wrt. the TA> arguing on bug fix vs. new feature I'd tend to consider it a case of TA> making the protocol implementation more complete and not really a cool TA> new net-snmnp feature. Risk is low. Any other comments/votes?
I have no objections, if you can find another vote of support... -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
