On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:20:25 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 19:53 -0400, Robert Story wrote:
DS> > On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 11:41:26 +0200 Thomas wrote:
DS> > TA> Has anyone ever thought of replacing the ".index" handling with
DS> > TA> something better?
DS> >
DS> > I'm sure it was done for simplicity. I wouldn't object to moving it,
DS> > though it will be more complicated to deal with multiple mib directories.
DS>
DS> How about
DS>
DS> /var/net-snmp/mib-index.1 (2, 3, 4 ...)
DS>
DS> each file containing the name of the MIB directory concerned,
DS> followed by the list of MIB file/module mappings.
And for non-root users?
DS> The other "something better" that has occasionally been suggested,
DS> is switching everything to use the libSMI MIB handling.
As in requiring that it is installed, or importing the code into our code
base? Both options have issues...
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
