DS> There's DS> nothing inherently different between that situation, and a pair DS> of 'agentSecName'/'iquerySecName' settings.
> Yes there is - mainly that the user has no idea that they are referring > to the same thing! They will if they can be bothered to read the documentation. (Once I've had time to actually *write* it, of course :-)) > It is possible that something set up by the first token would > be confused or get broken by the appearance of the second? eg > > agentSecName wallace > monitor .... > ... > iquerySecName grommit > monitor **** > > Would both monitor statements work? They'd certainly both work. The question is what access permissions should the first monitor statement use? I can code things either way. What would be the most natural behaviour? Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
