Dave Shield wrote:
Don't explicity configure in disman/event-mib, as it conflicts
with the new implementation that Dave just checked in.
Seconded.
If you explicitly add disman/event-mib, then you should also explicitly
*remove* disman/eventi. Having both is just Asking For Trouble.
/me has *deliberately* put in "disman/event-mib" *in order to* Ask For
Trouble. :-)
I'd expect a significant amount of people to use their known-to-work
configure lines from 5.2- to configure 5.3 when it's out. As including
"disman/event-mib" seems to be quite popular (hence our decision to
enable the corresponding dunctionality by default), we should cope with
it at configure time. Please note that those people are likely asking
for the functionality, rather than a particular implementation, so they
should get the new code, /me thinks.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
