Wes Hardaker wrote:
The following patch fixes this but certainly is not a change that
should be made lightly.  I'm very interested in other opinions about
it, especially in light of the fact it should go into 5.2.2:

I have yet to think about possible drawbacks of this particular code, but as far as "should a fix for this bug go into 5.2.2" is concerned, I'm much in favour of it.


+Thomas

--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to