>Correct. The function has all the time been documented as returning zero >for ok. At some point in time somebody has used it with incorrect checks >for ok returns. I have been over all uses and the complete code to make >sure all agrees on the head documentation. To make things even more >complicated it could even return an uninitialized status code.
I just spent the last hour looking at it and reached the same conclusion. This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal and or privileged information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take action relying on it. Any communication received in error, or subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
