>>>>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:17:52 -0400, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

TA> It can't do any 
TA> harm on other platforms than Solaris (since it lives in kernel_sunos5.c) 
TA> and looks like a highly important fix for Solaris users monitoring their 
TA> interfaces. We've had several complaints in the past on the lists. 

Robert> I was inclined to agree until I took a look at the code in
Robert> question. We've gone from setting an error for (rc < 0), to
Robert> (rc == 0) and now (rc != 0). This looks like either people
Robert> don't know what they are doing, or the error condition varies
Robert> by os/kernel version.

Robert> Since, as Thomas said, it can only affect solaris, I won't
Robert> actually vote against it going into 5.2.2, but I won't for it
Robert> either.

Ok, so I'd vote for it if Niels was *certain* it was the right thing
to do.  IE, he had read documentation that said it's the right thing
to do.  Which he at least hinted at.  Niels?

-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to