On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 11:04 +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> what do people think about adding "deprecated" warnings (documentation
> and runtime) to directives like "exec" (what else?) in 5.3? Or is 5.3
> considered too early for this?
Depends on the directive.
As far as "exec" is concerned, there's already a warning message for
the relocatable form of this directive (which is the important one).
We probably need to bump up the strength of this message for 5.3.
The only other candidates for "deprecated" directives that spring
to mind would be "r[ow]{community,user}" - assuming we want to push
people towards the new "auth{community,user}" directives instead.
> For exec vs. extend, this would probably call for more verbosity
> on "extend" in snmpd.conf(5), though.
Fair comment.
There are a number of my newer contributions that could do with
better documentation. I'll look at that once we've got the final
pre-pre-release burst of activity done with.
Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005
Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
