> I will urge you heavily to not decide upon an internal representation of > an integer. There is absolutely nothing "natural" about integer as a > representation of an IPv4 address.
Fair comment. There's probably a danger of us getting bogged down in detail before we've clarified the basic principles. The real question is whether network addresses should be represented internally in a native-style format (struct in_addr, in_addr_t, struct in6_addr, etc) or in SNMP format (char[]) At the moment we seem to have a mixture, which is Not a Good Thing. Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
