That is what I thought so, but actually I am getting more rows than the
max_repetitions I am giving.
And in the case when the table size is bigger than the max_repetitions, you
are implying no other indication of not able to retrieving the whole table
just the response will be stopped earlier?
From: Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Haizhu Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: GET_BULK questions
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:15:02 +0100
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:31:51PM -0500, Haizhu Liu wrote:
> My questions on retrieving table information using GET_BULK are:
>
> 1. If the max_repetitions is said to 1000, I should only see a return of
> 1000 rows, but it seems that I do see more rows.
> 2. If the table is huge, passed the limit of snmp message. Will there be
an
> indication that only partitial table is retrieved? So that further
GET_BULK
> is needed?
Assume that you send a message:
GET_BULK(non_repeaters: 0, max_repetitions:1000, column1, column2)
Then you should get the 1000 items that follow column1 and the 1000 items
that
follows column2 in the order column1.idx1, column2.idx1, column1.idx2, ...
If the resulting message gets to big it should get truncated early.
See RFC 1905, 4.2.3 for further discussion.
/MF
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
