>>>>> On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:42:31 +0000, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> So, since it didn't >> look like anyone was going to do the work to fix snmpnetstat to use >> the older args, Dave> <sigh> Dave> OK - I'll look at doing that as well. Dave> I can see that I'm not going to get *any* work done on TBB this Dave> month either :-( Which is why I didn't want to do it either... IMHO, it's a waste of energy that isn't really needed and the time would be better spent working on other things rather. >> and since I'd be yelled at (worse) for including the >> newer version that only left option #1. Dave> Actually, I'm quite happy that you pulled the old code from CVS. Dave> It's the premature release of 5.2.2.rc4 that I'm objecting to. Well, I didn't think it was premature since at the time it didn't look like anyone wanted to do the back-port of the command line args (the hard part; the merge of the existing query stuff into the current version is trivial I'd naively assume). Because of that, pulling it and publishing was the right thing in my mind otherwise we'd never release it. I was acting based on the input I had... Sorry if it was wrong. Dave> Should we pull the old code from the 5.1 and 5.0 lines too? If we're going to make a release, definitely. If you're bored, sure! [I'll get to it eventually but I'm not in a hurry either] -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
