>>>>> On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:35:53 -0500, "G. S. Marzot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> said:
G> yes it does - and not at all. G> Its a good suggestion. The only concern is whackage to existing code G> base...it really does make sense that the session setting, if present, G> should trump the more general/global setting. If it does, it's because they likely tried to do it one way and left the code in when it didn't work, and then change the global setting again without changing the broken per-session code and thus I think the chances of this are unlikely and though it isn't backwards compatible, I think the change should be done because it makes sense and backwards compatibility won't likely hurt anyone, unlike this run-on sentence. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
