On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 13:22 -0500, Robert Story wrote:
> I've filed a bug report as well, though I'm not sure how
> we'll ever fix the problem if this is too large a change.
Just to be clear, I was suggesting that this was perhaps too
large a change at this point in the release cycle.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That certainly wouldn't block the same change being made post
the 5.3 release.
I've also re-read this thread, and am somewhat confused as to
exactly:
a) what the original problem was
(esp. this get-next loop that went bad)
b) what the extent of the backward
compatibility problems were
c) what was being proposed to fix it
It *sounded* like a fairly significant change, which is
what I was responding to. Moving and re-naming a single
variable doesn't feel like it should have any effect, so
I'm now confused about the backward compatibility side
of things.
Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
