On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 01:33 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Dave Shield wrote:
> > But I'll get the main man page documentation finished first.
> 
> I like what you did.

Not "did" - "doing".
I haven't finished yet - there's a limit to how much documentation
I can rewrite when I'm out at concerts, and working in the garden
over the weekend, and on Help Desk all day Monday.

Plus it's difficult to get a feel for the balance of things
without printing out the new version again.


>  Even so much that I'd call for comments whether to 
> apply similar changes to snmpd.conf(5) in 5.2.2. Anyone?
> 
> As another possible improvement: may it make sense to explicitely tell 
> people about the mib module dependencies of a (group of) token(s)? E.g. 
> that "smuxpeer" depends on whether the "smux" mib module had been 
> compiled in? (This isn't always obvious from the name.)

<JMorris>
   Don't be so impatient, Thomas!
</JMorris>

I hadn't got as far as the SMUX code yesterday - all I'd done
was group the various extension blocks together.  I've now got
(handwritten) reworkings of the rest of this section, which
should get typed up and committed later today.

I know how I want to restructure the remaining sections of
the man page too - hopefully that'll be done over the course
of this week.


But I'm glad you like it so far.

Dave


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.  Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course.  Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to