I didn't reproduce leak on 5.0.10.2 on standard linux system with the same testcase, only saw it on my system which is based on linux but not standard.
-----Original Message----- From: Robert Story [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 2:10 PM To: Wes Hardaker Cc: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net; Dave Shield; Fong Tsui Subject: Re: snmpd memory grows on invalid udp requests --- security???? On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:39:54 -0800 Wes wrote: WH> >> So, then the question to coders and the admins is, does WH> >> this qualify as a DOS, worth a 5.0.10.3 release? I'd lean WH> >> towards yes. WH> WH> Dave> Are you sitting down, Robert? WH> Dave> I'm about to agree with you - I think we probably WH> Dave> should plan to cut another 5.0.x release. WH> ... WH> WH> Ok, I'd think all this warrants 5.0.11 actually. Say January-ish? Actually, the only issue seems to be the snmpnetstat license issue. No word on reproducing the leak on 5.0.10.2. Any why the jump to 5.0.11, instead of 5.0.10.3? I though we had decided to EOL 5.0 w/5.0.10.x. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv28&alloc_id845&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
