On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 16:47 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote: > Rephrased: I think it *currently* fills a gap that the other *existing* > tests leave. (And as such, it's IMHO *currently* quite useful)
Agreed. And I'm not proposing to remove it. or at least, not until there's something better to take it's place. All I'm saying is that I don't propose to spend much time patching improvements onto it - I'd rather concentrate on a better replacement. But if you wish to propose/implement stuff, feel free. Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
