On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:59:21 +0000 Dave wrote:
DS> In the main development line (i.e. 5.3.preN) - I have some reservations,
DS> but am prepared to suppress them in the interests of global peace and
DS> harmony.
/me hugs dave.
DS> In the 5.2.x line, this would definitely be inappropriate (IMO) until
DS> the post-release code freeze is lifted, and I'm not too comfortable
DS> with the idea even then.
I don't think most of the fixes to mfd are in 5.2, so it wouldn't make nearly
as much sense. I'd be more then glad to refer people w/5.2.x mfd complaints to
5.3.
DS> I won't actually vote against, but I never
DS> like the idea of automatically-generated patches!
All changes are reviewed before checking them in.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
