On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 08:59 -0500, Robert Story wrote: > On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 09:16:19 +0000 Dave wrote: > DS> Having done a bit of work on 'get_exec_output', I don't > DS> think that should be too difficult. But it's definitely > DS> something for 5.4ff, rather than trying to squeeze it in now! > > So what do you think is reasonable to fit into 5.3? > If there is a change in behavior, it needs to be well documented.
The code I committed yesterday implements 'get_exec_output' as a wrapper round 'run_exec_command'. This means that the "pass" directive will handle quoted parameters correctly. I've retained the same file-based, shared-cache behaviour from the previous code. Note this is Unix-only. I haven't touched the Windows-specific block - that's still associated with 'get_exec_output' rather than 'run_exec_command'. I don't think any of this should affect visible behaviour (apart from the token parsing). It was more driven by a desire to fix (and process) things in one place rather than two. Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
