On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:21:29 +0100 Magnus wrote:
MF> It seems that delegated handlers that return ENDOFMIBVIEW as response to
MF> a GETNEXT request won't trigger any further advancement in the registry so
MF> they might end up returning a false ENDOFMIBVIEW (or, in some cases, an
MF> NOSUCHOBJECT or NOSUCHINSTANCE)
MF>
MF> Is this all intentional?
MF> What would be the right thing to return from my outstanding item? NULL?
They shouldn't return ENDOFMIBVIEW, they should set the request error to
ENDOFMIBVIEW and return success/noerror.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
