On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 10:33:33 +0000 Dave wrote:
DS> On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 15:17 -0500, Robert Story wrote:
DS> > I assume one of you also made sure the patched version continue
DS> > to work with the older style proc entries as well?
DS>
DS> I examined the code to determine that it *ought* to work, yes
DS> (since it's effectively just ignoring the new ":" separators).
DS> I didn't have access to a properly networked environment to
DS> check it for real - that's why the patch has only been applied
DS> to the main development line.
Copying the proc file to /tmp and editing it, and changing the path to /tmp in
the source is how I test other people's environments.
I also had someone tell me on irc the other day that the format change was
reversed in the kernel, so it might have been a temporary thing in a test
kernel. Radek, were you testing a released kernel, or a patched test kernel?
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
