>>>>> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:29:31 +0100 (CET), "Peder Chr. Norgaard" <[EMAIL >>>>> PROTECTED]> said:
Peder> The monitoring solution is inherently a terrible inefficient Peder> way of generating data for what is basically an alarm: you face Peder> an unholy choice between heavy load even when everything is OK, Peder> and large delay in being told that something is wrong. Yep. Agreed. And I'm saying that as the person that implemented the suggested text for turning on linkUp/linkDown alarms. The only reasons that it's done that way are: 1) it's OS independent. netlink is linux specific, for example. 2) it was easy It's certainly not ideal and patches to implement a proper kernel tie would be greatly appreciated. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
