Thanks, I was getting ready to look into making the changes and submit a patch. Can you let me know when the patch is available?
--- Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 31 May 2006 15:01:55 -0700 (PDT), > rwilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > rwilcox> If VACM determines that a particular SET > operation > rwilcox> is in error(anything but VACM_SUCCESS), > what should > rwilcox> the response-pdu's error-status be? I am > reading > rwilcox> RFC 3416 p. 19 Section 1 which seems to > suggest that > rwilcox> noAccess should be the error-status. > However, I am > rwilcox> receiving notWritable. > > Ok, I've read your last 2 notes and this one and I > have to say only > one thing: I suck for not responding earlier. > > However, you are correct I believe and I'll patch > the appropriate > current branches. > > -- > Wes Hardaker > Sparta, Inc. > _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
