Dave Shield wrote: >> Without having looked into whether/how it could be done (yet), what >> about something along the lines of >> >> authuser * log,execute,net authNoPriv >> > That feels like snmp*.conf syntax, which should already be covered by the > current code.
Is it? My testing indicates it's not, but I'd be more than happy to be proven wrong. To clarify: this indeed is meant to be (example) snmptrapd.conf syntax to authorize authNoPriv notifications from *any* (configured/active) SNMPv3/USM user which I think would be worth to support. +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de) _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
