On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:38:47 +0200 Thomas wrote:
TA> Thomas Anders wrote:
TA> > I've attached a patch against 5.3.x CVS that adjusts the change to how
TA> > it was probably meant in the first place. It finally brings
TA> > udpLocalAddress handling in line with udpLocalPort handling.
TA> >
TA> > I'm calling for votes to apply this to 5.3.1.
TA>
TA> Works for me at least for Linux/x86:
TA>
TA> RFC1213-MIB::udpLocalAddress.127.0.0.1.123 = IpAddress: 127.0.0.1
TA> RFC1213-MIB::udpLocalAddress.127.0.0.1.8161 = IpAddress: 127.0.0.1
I'd be more impressed w/tests on Solaris x86 vs Solaric Sparc.
I can't see how just reversing the patch, which fixed some platform, is going
to work w/out breaking that platform again.
I'd think that something like an ifdef for byteorder is needed in there
somewhere.
What we really need is a policy for how we store ip address/port information,
and then a good code audit to enforce that policy. We've had this discussion
before, not that long ago.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
