On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:16:27 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> >On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:16:27 +0200 Thomas wrote:
DS> >TA> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DS> >TA> >   OpenBSD:
DS> >TA> >     tcpTable:  bogus contents
DS> >TA> >         [agent requires root access]
DS> >TA> 
DS> >TA> Does anyone have an idea this problem as well?
DS> >
DS> >Based on yesterday's CVS, the tcpConnTable (I assume that's what Dave
DS> >means by tcpTable)
DS> >
DS> Yup.
DS> 
DS> > looks fine on my x86 OpenBSD 3.8 box.
DS> >
DS> Hmmm... I'm seeing as follows (OpenBSD 6.0):

The current release is OpenBSD 3.9 which was released May 1, 2006. I think you
must mean FreeBSD.

On my FreeBSD box:

$ apps/snmpwalk -v2c -c pub -m ALL -M mibs localhost:1161 tcpConnTable 
tcpConnState.192.168.1.160.22.192.168.1.88.56150 = INTEGER: established(5)
tcpConnLocalAddress.192.168.1.160.22.192.168.1.88.56150 = IpAddress: 
192.168.1.160
tcpConnLocalPort.192.168.1.160.22.192.168.1.88.56150 = INTEGER: 22
tcpConnRemAddress.192.168.1.160.22.192.168.1.88.56150 = IpAddress: 192.168.1.88
tcpConnRemPort.192.168.1.160.22.192.168.1.88.56150 = INTEGER: 56150

DS> and the agent spits out the following error:
DS> kvm_read(*, 7f, 0x7ffa3200, 216) = -1: invalid address (7f)

I do get a kvm_read error on OpenBSD 3.8 as well, but everything still works. I 
do not get this error on my FreeBSD box.

-- 
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>

You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. 

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to