I would go with #3 as there are no changes to the source. Alex
Wes Hardaker wrote: > I've published 5.3.1 and will make a formal announcement to the > -announce list a bit later. The one issue with it is that I blew the > generation of the NEWS file. There is now a new NEWS file in CVS in > the 5.3 branch, but it's not what's in the tar ball (I noticed it > about 5 seconds after uploading it to the SF servers and accepting the > file). > > Opinions on whether I should: > > 1) publish 5.3.1.1 on monday to fix JUST the news file > 2) don't and leave as is > 3) publish 5.3.1.tar.***bz2*** (or .tgz) with the proper NEWS file > > They all suck in different ways. I'd appreciate opinions on which bad > option you'd prefer (feel free to create your own bad options as well). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
